vehicle signal
U.S. public vehicle records

2014 Piaggio FLY 150: complaints, problems and recalls

Explore the records behind recurring owner reports.

Key facts

1 owner complaints analyzed

0 distinct recall campaigns

Not available median reported failure mileage

Scope: 2014 model year. Data snapshot: . 0 complaints include usable failure mileage.

This selection has limited data. It remains available for lookup but is excluded from search indexing.

Owner-reported patterns

Most common problems

Structure is the most frequently named component, appearing in 1 of 1 complaints (100.0%). A complaint can name multiple components.

Component breakdown

Number of unique complaints naming each component. Top eight shown.

Structure
1
Component breakdown data
CategoryCount
Structure1

Structure: 1

Reported problems by failure mileage

Complaint counts in mileage bands. These are not failure rates per vehicle or mile.

Under 25,000
0
25,000 to 49,999
0
50,000 to 74,999
0
75,000 to 99,999
0
100,000 to 149,999
0
150,000 and above
0
Reported problems by failure mileage data
CategoryCount
Under 25,0000
25,000 to 49,9990
50,000 to 74,9990
75,000 to 99,9990
100,000 to 149,9990
150,000 and above0

Under 25,000: 0; 25,000 to 49,999: 0; 50,000 to 74,999: 0; 75,000 to 99,999: 0; 100,000 to 149,999: 0; 150,000 and above: 0

No usable failure mileage is recorded. 1 complaints have missing, zero or invalid mileage.

Complaints over time

Year the complaint was filed, not the vehicle model year or incident year. The snapshot year is partial.

2014
1
Complaints over time data
CategoryCount
20141

2014: 1

Pattern summary

Structure leads the component reports. Use these patterns to inspect individual reports and prepare questions for a mechanic.

Calculated from recorded counts. An AI narrative has not been published for this selection.

Examples from the source records

Examples provide context, not a representative sample or a verified diagnosis.

Owner report 10596396 · 2014-06-05 (June 5, 2014)

THE PIAGGIO FLY 150 SCOOTER HAS A DESIGN FLAW. THE RUBBER BUFFER THAT SEPARATES THE CENTER STAND FROM THE ENGINE CASE IN THE UP POSITION IS TOO BIG. THIS CAUSE THE CENTER STAND TO SCRAPE/HIT THE GROUND WHEN CORNERING OR TRAVELLING OVER CURBS. WHEN THE CENTER STAND STRIKES THE GROUND, THE PIVOTING EFFECT COULD BE ENOUGH TO CAUSE THE REAR WHEEL TO LOSE FIRM CONTACT WITH THE PAVEMENT. THERE ARE MULTIPLE INTERNET FORUM ENTRIES BY OWNERS OF THIS SCOOTER THAT REFER TO THIS PROBLEM. MOST OF THE FORUM ENTRIES DISCUSS THE OWNERS OF THE SCOOTERS REMOVING…

Owner-reported narrative. Look up ODI 10596396 at NHTSA ↗

Recall history

0 distinct campaigns affect this selection. Announcement dates below are different from vehicle model years. A campaign may cover multiple years.

No recall campaigns are recorded in this snapshot.