vehicle signal
U.S. public vehicle records

2006 Arctic Cat 700 EFI: complaints, problems and recalls

Explore the records behind recurring owner reports.

Key facts

1 owner complaints analyzed

0 distinct recall campaigns

Not available median reported failure mileage

Scope: 2006 model year. Data snapshot: . 0 complaints include usable failure mileage.

This selection has limited data. It remains available for lookup but is excluded from search indexing.

Owner-reported patterns

Most common problems

Suspension is the most frequently named component, appearing in 1 of 1 complaints (100.0%). A complaint can name multiple components.

Component breakdown

Number of unique complaints naming each component. Top eight shown.

Suspension
1
Component breakdown data
CategoryCount
Suspension1

Suspension: 1

Reported problems by failure mileage

Complaint counts in mileage bands. These are not failure rates per vehicle or mile.

Under 25,000
0
25,000 to 49,999
0
50,000 to 74,999
0
75,000 to 99,999
0
100,000 to 149,999
0
150,000 and above
0
Reported problems by failure mileage data
CategoryCount
Under 25,0000
25,000 to 49,9990
50,000 to 74,9990
75,000 to 99,9990
100,000 to 149,9990
150,000 and above0

Under 25,000: 0; 25,000 to 49,999: 0; 50,000 to 74,999: 0; 75,000 to 99,999: 0; 100,000 to 149,999: 0; 150,000 and above: 0

No usable failure mileage is recorded. 1 complaints have missing, zero or invalid mileage.

Complaints over time

Year the complaint was filed, not the vehicle model year or incident year. The snapshot year is partial.

2019
1
Complaints over time data
CategoryCount
20191

2019: 1

Pattern summary

Suspension leads the component reports. Use these patterns to inspect individual reports and prepare questions for a mechanic.

Calculated from recorded counts. An AI narrative has not been published for this selection.

Examples from the source records

Examples provide context, not a representative sample or a verified diagnosis.

Owner report 11190275 · 2019-03-20 (March 20, 2019)

RIGHT FRONT BALL JOINT SEPARATED FROM A-ARM DUE TO THE PINCH BOLT THREADS WEARING. CATASTROPHIC INJURY TO RIDERS OCCURRED. BALL JOINTS ON THIS MODEL (AND MANY OTHERS BY AC, KAWASAKI, ETC), ARE SECURED TO THE A-ARM WITH A PINCH BOLT. OEM FOR THE BOLT WAS A FULLY THREADED CAP SCREW. THE THREADS CAN WEAR, THUS NOT ENGAGING WITH THE GROVE IN THE SPINDLE OF THE BALL JOINT. EVEN WITH THE CAP SCREW IN PLACE AND PROPERLY TORQUED, THE BALL JOINT CAN SEPARATE AND LEAD TO LOSS OF CONTROL. IN THIS CASE, BALL JOINT SEPARATED, DRIVER LOST CONTROL, ROLLED,…

Owner-reported narrative. Look up ODI 11190275 at NHTSA ↗

Recall history

0 distinct campaigns affect this selection. Announcement dates below are different from vehicle model years. A campaign may cover multiple years.

No recall campaigns are recorded in this snapshot.